Revisionism and fascism and the cunts who adhere to suchlike
by Will, 14 February 2008
Yes - I know it’s old but…
The main reason I link to this piece is I don’t think it has the prominence it should have on the webnet.
In other words Spiked Online are a bunch of fash cunts.
I urge all other bloggers to link to it now. Let’s make these cunts out to be the obvious cunts they are.
Brendan O’Neill is a Guardian writer - and a fucking cunt (that’s just for good measure).




Thursday 14 February 2008 at 2:29
Huh? Between the Guardian, SourceWatch, George Monbiot, and Nick Cohen’s biannual RCP gossip, it’s pretty well covered online.
[well it’s covered even more now you prick.
Where do you live? I want to hunt you down you fash piece of shit.]
Thursday 14 February 2008 at 2:43
CH is a ‘member’ of the cult known as Spiked Online — previously known as the RCP — before that known as the Revolutionary Communist Party.
CH is a cultist.
Like those scientologist cunts. Yeah– just like them.
Thursday 14 February 2008 at 11:38
Name and shame, Will. Name and shame.
Thursday 14 February 2008 at 15:58
Aye, that Vulliamy article is excellent and should be reprinted whenever possible. It’s also worth remembering that the revisionism and denial of the RCPers doesn’t end with Bosnia–they did the same thing with Rwanda. These people are scum of the highest order.
Thursday 14 February 2008 at 18:38
Entryist cunts too. They’ve got their grubby paws in too many scientific/development organisations for my liking. They’d deny it of course. In fact they have. So lying cunts as well.
Thursday 14 February 2008 at 19:20
From Vulliamy’s article: Living Marxism’s attempts to re-write the history of the camps was motivated by the fact that in their heart of hearts, these people applauded those camps and sympathised with their cause and wished to see it triumph.
Forgive me for getting confused, but I am at a loss to see just how such people choose sides. Here we have Serbs (possible Soviet sympathisers, anti-Muslim, but scarcely Socialists) trying to exterminate (mostly) Muslims. Niall Ferguson saw the primary motivation for this and other murderous wars as being primarily racist, rather than cultural, and certainly not political. So why would such a motley group as Fay Weldon, Doris Lessing, Harold Evans, Toby Young, etc. make common cause with some neo-Stalinists? As for LM, there is a large degree of intellectual laziness, such as characterises much “post-modern discourse”, but why not side with the underdogs and fellow jew haters - the Muslims?
Could it have something to do with the fact that the only people who saw this conflict for what it was were the Americans? This is visceral Lord of the Flies brutality.
Thursday 14 February 2008 at 19:49
Niall Ferguson is an idiot. So are you. Fuck off.
Thursday 14 February 2008 at 21:55
I was feeling charitable and was going to explain to you why you’re wrong, but you’re seemingly so thick that I really can’t be bothered.