Comments

1. hakmao

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 9:37

   Does he know who is running in the 3.15 at Cheltenham?

2. SnoopyTheGoon

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 10:51

   Oh come on, Will. It is not Gore the person I have a problem with, it is our innate (inane) burning passion to find a messiah.

   More over at my place.

3. Flea

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 13:11

   Speaking for myself, I do have a problem with an “over-consuming”, self-satisfied hypocrite being lauded yet again. Fuck him and fuck manbearpig.

   The Nobel committee awarding the man a Peace Prize for acts which are not only objectively false but which objectively have nothing to do with peace. Yes. But we will have to see if the Hitch is right and this spurs al-Gor to stand for the Democratic nomination. And, unlike, Hitchens, I think Gore would be a disastrous President and disastrous for the free world.

4. Will

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 13:14

   So you’re a bit conflicted on this one then Flea :)

5. Graeme

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 14:24

   Hitchens waxes his balls.

   http://chasemeladies.blogspot.com/2007/10/o-what-noble-mind-is-here-oerthrown.html

6. Will

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 14:30

   The comments under that post are like what you get at Stalin’s Tombola or Sonic’s Shitty watch S[h]ite.

   I.e — electronic crayon wielding thick cunts.

   PS. I remember when Harry Hutton was funny. Now he just licks the arse of lenny the loon.

7. Graeme

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 14:33

   I don’t read comments anymore. I have a low prick tolerance.

8. laconian

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 14:44

   Speaking purely as a sci-fi fan, isn’t it great that two science fiction writers (Lessing and Gore) have won Nobel Prizes this year?

9. hakmao

   Friday 12 October 2007 at 22:45

   Oh I dunno, the science may be dodgy in places, but I still prefer Gore to Bush or that sleazy creep Clinton. Let’s see, despite being an opponent of the Vietnam War, he didn’t avoid service (unlike Clinton and Bush), and he was a strong and consistent opponent of Saddam Hussein when the indefatigable one was dictator of the moment in Washington. There are the usual neo-liberal and god bothering noises emanating from the Gore entity, but we’re talking about a bloke from a party which represents the interests of the bourgeoisie — it goes with the territory.

   If he were running and I was a seppo, I might actually vote for him.

10. Will

    Friday 12 October 2007 at 22:51

    What Hak said.

    The more lunatic rightwads hate (in a general - making sense of the world sort of way - the more I’m comfortable with him) — Run Al Run!

11. John in Cincinnati

    Sunday 14 October 2007 at 17:14

    “electronic crayon wielding thick cunts”

    We have GOT to start a band with that name.